Publications
Home | Publications
This report presents the findings of the Municipal Budgeting and Financial Management Survey conducted by the We Pay You Deliver (WPYD) Consortium. The consortium consists of 10 organisations namely Danish Church Aid, Combined Harare Residents Association, Harare Residents Trust, Bulawayo Progressive Residents Association, Habakkuk Trust, Women’s Institute for Leadership Development, Zimbabwe Women Resource Centre Network, United Mutare Residents and Ratepayers Trust, Masvingo United Residents and Ratepayers Alliance and Diakonia. The aim of the survey was to understand local authority budgeting processes and suggest ways of increasing the participation of residents in the said process. The survey was conducted in five (5) cities namely Bulawayo, Harare, Gweru, Masvingo and Mutare. In terms of coverage, the survey covered 5 Wards per city (2 high density, 2 medium density and 1 low-density) meaning a total of 20 wards were covered during the survey. In total 5,284 respondents (3110 were women that is about 58.9%) participated in the survey conducted between April and June 2018. In addition, the survey team conducted in-depth interviews with finance staff from the following local authorities: Gweru, Harare, Bulawayo, and Masvingo. Interviews were also conducted with representatives of residents associations and civil society organisations in the consortium.
For more the complete report click on the PDF below
European Union (EU) Member States recently agreed to adopt the full EU/CSOs Roadmap consultative document as compiled by the European Union (EU) in Collaboration with Civil Society Organisations in Zimbabwe.
The adopted document is a result of an extensive exercise undertaken all over Zimbabwe by the Delegation of the EU to Zimbabwe in collaboration with EU member states, Civil Society in the country, in particular the umbrella organisation NANGO in the months of March-June 2014. The successful finalisation of the document and its subsequent adoption mark the beginning of yet another rigorous, but important process of implementing set actions towards achieving the identified and desired priorities, actions and indicators for the next years of EU support to civil society in Zimbabwe.
The consultations with civil society led by the EU is seen by many as important as the context of EU-Zimbabwe relations is quickly changing from a time of restricted cooperation due to application of article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement, to progressive normalization by the two parties. On the other hand, civil society in Zimbabwe is undergoing a self reflective and strategic process to effectively engage the Government of Zimbabwe (GoZ) and meaningfully influence decision making process for the benefit of Zimbabwean citizenry.
The consultative process identified three main areas where civil society actors can make vital contributions to enhance positive development and governance outcomes. These are an enabling Environment (1), Roles and participation of CSOs (2), and Capacity Building of Civil Society (3). Under these three main areas, there are identified priorities, accompanied with clear course of actions and indicators for implementation processes.
Land is central to the livelihoods of the majority of people in Zimbabwe who are resident in the countryside. Not only is the land important for food production and self-sustenance, but it also provides a sense of belonging to people while also providing raw materials for use in the manufacturing and industrial sectors. Land is thus critical for an agro-based economy like Zimbabwe where agriculture is the second highest export earner after mining (Chambati, Mazwi & Mberi 2016). The importance of land and agriculture cannot, therefore, be overemphasised enough.
Zimbabwe is one of the few countries in Africa to have experienced land dispossessions of the indigenous populace after the colonial conquest alongside Kenya, Namibia and South Africa (Moyo 2016). Such countries, also known as former settler colonies, were characterised by iniquitous land ownership patterns that pushed the majority of the black population to
marginal lands while reducing some to farm laborers, thus setting a stage for armed struggles, which were led by various liberation movements (ibid). For Zimbabwe, the demand for land
was one of the major driving issues for the waging of the liberation struggle, which eventually culminated in independence in 1980 (Habib 2011). However, it is important to note that at
independence, the newly established black government led by former President Robert Mugabe could not address land inequalities inherited from colonialism due to constitutional
provisions requiring land transfers to be done under markets for the first 10 years after the onset of Independence (Moyo 1995). Such a clause was also inserted in the South African and
Namibian constitutions, leading to the stalling of agrarian transformation. The other option to pursue land transfers would have been through a radical land redistribution exercise in
defiance of the Constitution and the Lancaster House Agreement.
Budgeting-Survey-Report.-DCA.pdf